ungovernable: (059)
ᴇᴄᴄᴇɴᴛʀɪᴄ ɴᴏʀᴛʜᴇʀɴ ᴍɪɴx ([personal profile] ungovernable) wrote in [community profile] faderift 2016-03-13 08:37 am (UTC)

( a deep breath and a slightly more full than is entirely socially acceptable glass of wine -

she's not going to dissuade them from a statement, that's obvious, so she chooses her battles; )


Such a statement must be carefully made. Courting the ire of the Inquisition leadership will not protect mages - we must take care to leave no ambiguity as to our support for them. More than this one man, we cannot forget that division here - weakness - it is the weapon of our enemy.

( and she is much more concerned about corypheus than anders, who should've done them all a favour and died in kirkwall. after a moment, )

And as such, I think to provide our own measure of security in the supervision of a mage more familiar with his specialty than those among the Wardens is a stronger gesture for the fact it is not our responsibility to do so. We do not simply shake our little fists and stomp our little feet at a decision we dislike; we act to ensure our own are not jeopardised by it. We simply do not have the luxury of being as separate as all that. We are not.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting