dashing: (♛ cruaidh.)
ᏂᏋᏒᎥᏗᏁ "ᏖᏂᏋ ᏦᎥᏝᏝᏠᎧᎩ" ᏗᎷᏕᏋᏝ ([personal profile] dashing) wrote in [community profile] faderift2018-06-08 01:11 pm

set your heart against the scales, keep your head above the tide

WHO: Ambassador Amsel & others
WHAT: a Herian catch-all
WHEN: through the month
WHERE: Kirkwall
NOTES: closed and open starters to be added through the month, I have a hideous cold atm and am even more forgetful than usual, so if we have discussed something and I've neglected to follow up or set something up, please don't hesitate to contact me.
ipseite: (016)

[personal profile] ipseite 2018-06-13 11:35 am (UTC)(link)
( petrana makes no such endeavour; she lowers a hand and permits the corgi to investigate it, smiling very slightly. warm—at her ease. she says, still smiling, )

I should sooner you respect—indeed, require—my professionalism.

( these matters will not be resolved by anything else. certainly, she'd be lying if she couldn't imagine reasons why "rifters" might prefer not to discuss this matter with a division head; she could even think of reasons why she, personally, might be loathe to address the matter with a loyalist.

pretending any of those reasons matter will serve only to hand them all gently and courteously from the frying pan and into the fire.

but to details;
)

I have been considering the matter from another angle, ( thoughtful, scratching the corgi beneath his adorable corgi chin. who is a good boy. it's you, you're the good boy. ) The Venatori interest in rifters and shard-bearers is well-documented—the abductions, the Vedici matter. We may be as well-served by a voice in support of the Chantry's motion—if, say, the support came from a Tevene voice, and could be perceived as aligning these interests.

Tevinter has much to be concerned about, where go rifters. And we have crossed their paths, and crossed their scions—were I a clergywoman, I might reconsider a stance that could publicly align me with the black divine.
ipseite: (011)

[personal profile] ipseite 2018-06-18 11:39 am (UTC)(link)
It is a reasoning that I understand, ( and she can be gracious about understanding it—she's had so much practise, of late, though she has found herself sorely tested and perhaps has not always been as gracious as she might wish of herself with one colleague of herian's in particular. ) Certainly I don't disagree that our priority must be the work. I simply felt it worthwhile to consider the ways in which that work is better done.

And that has been borne out, here, with rifters. Few of them will share that priority, ( frankly, ) and the weakness of that separation and their suspicion is the weakness being exploited. They do not feel safe, and they turn, mistrustful, from the only things that can provide safety to them.

It will be difficult. Which is why I feel a more broad approach is wise, yes; the narrower our focus in this, the easier to chip into it.
ipseite: (113)

[personal profile] ipseite 2018-07-01 12:14 am (UTC)(link)
It is an interesting suggestion, but I share your concerns regarding the feasibility of implementing it with any true success. Regrettably,

( and she is a little regretful, if only for the position it now places them in—she should have seen this, should have been better prepared to combat it, but it had been such a source of acute frustration and her own biases had coloured her resentment, her irritation at being forced to shoulder the burden of ungrateful strangers even so much as she had done, )

I am no expert on the question of what these rifters will be prepared to tolerate.

( from the way they discuss the matter already, it seems clear to her it would be a question of persuading them to tolerate it, more than anything. )

I think it would be shortsighted to cast it aside without an effort, at least. Perhaps they would surprise us.