altusimperius (
altusimperius) wrote in
faderift2024-01-31 09:20 pm
Entry tags:
player plot: we'll put on a show (part 1?)
WHO: Everyone (EVERYONE)
WHAT: interviews for the dramatic rendition of Riftwatch’s glorious tale
WHEN: late Wintermarch/early Guardian
WHERE: The Gallows
NOTES: A follow-up to this post. (big ups to Cass & Lana for helping me come up with questions)
WHAT: interviews for the dramatic rendition of Riftwatch’s glorious tale
WHEN: late Wintermarch/early Guardian
WHERE: The Gallows
NOTES: A follow-up to this post. (big ups to Cass & Lana for helping me come up with questions)
On one auspicious day, in the very early morning, the first ferry brings to Riftwatch four tablet-and-charcoal bearing scribes in the unmistakably gaudy finery marking them as employees of Val Royeaux’s foremost playwright, André L’Euilled Ouebbre. They set about their task at once, leaving no stone unturned and no member of Riftwatch un-interviewed, even if this means following them into the baths, standing outside the lavatory, shouting at an office door, or trotting up many flights of stairs.
They can, of course, be forcibly removed under the right circumstances, but the repercussions of doing this may be undesirable. Who can say.
[While filling out the following questionnaire, please place an asterisk beside any answers on which you would like to elaborate further, in which case you will be assigned a scribe to tag out the resulting conversation.
In the subject line, you can either select one of the following or say ‘random’ to be assigned someone via RNG:
Jean Evain, a middle-aged Orlesian who carries snacks with him to entice his subjects to stop and chat longer; however, they will find that these snacks are way too spicy,
Eileen Marrow, a serious and hard-boiled war reporter who seems rather incongruously matched with this set, but is nonetheless here to get the facts at any cost,
Thibault Gérin, a straight-faced young fellow who takes copious notes in magnificent penmanship, who listens with rapt intent but somehow seems incapable of taking away the correct message,
and
Louis Boucher, a fast-talking and bright-eyed man with an avid interest in his subjects and a talent for twisting their words into whatever he finds more interesting in the moment.
All data will be taken into account, and there will be a follow-up post/announcement/plot sometime in the future after the play is written and the PR reckoning is at hand.
And now, without further ado, the questionnaire (please answer as though your character is being interviewed in person):

no subject
[Frankly, Gannicus doesn’t think it would be a play he would watch if it wasn’t glorious.]
All Watch.
no subject
Of course. Of course it must be.
[ Looking up again— ]
Then when you spoke of the genre of the play; death, wine, women... a heroic—!
[ Thibault focus you're meant to be a scribe. Soft throat clear. ]
Er... what do these things mean, to you?
no subject
[He leans back a little, his eyebrows rising up his forehead, and he laughs.]
How does that matter?
no subject
To tell such a story, one that ends in death for all, and not have it be received as tragedy... we must teach those who come to the playhouse how to understand in a new way. To understand the way you do.
no subject
Should not a tragedy also contain the potential for glory?
[Gannicus is no storyteller, but:]
Should not the most meager and forgotten have opportunity to know lives matter even when all that contained could be small, and fleeting?