WHO: Athessa & Wysteria, walk-ins welcome
WHAT: Ranking the hotness of their coworkers
WHEN: Now, during mod-plot
WHERE: Orlais
NOTES: keepin' it light and spammy
[ Well, what else are ya supposed to do when scrubbing sigils off of walls? ]I mean I
guess he could be cute...if he changed his hair.
no subject
Not that Mr. Ellis lacks in either category. He is plenty bright. And I assume that most Wardens are [hmmmmmmm, pausing to consider their roster of Wardens and then promptly editing her direction accordingly] dashing in concept. When you don't know them well.
Consider Enchanter Julius, were he slightly younger and unattached. Or Enchanter Leander, I suppose. He is quite sharp.
no subject
And Enchanter Julius is too bookish. If we're choosing between Enchanters, I'd prefer Rowntree. Or Kostos, but I don't think of him as an Enchanter, and he's...
[ Clever, sure, dashing...no. Dashing implies more than looks. ] An asshole. Which doesn't discount him, for me, clearly, but.
no subject
UGH! [she exclaims practically on top of Athessa's assessment of the Younger Averesch. Wysteria plunges her scrub brush into the nearby sudsy bucket.]
The man's personality is utterly a disqualification!
no subject
Translates well into enthusiasm though.
[ Wink wonk. ]
no subject
No!
[Her arm is still submerged in the bucket.]
no subject
[ Spoken from experience, you see. Athessa puts a little more elbow-grease into a particularly stuck-on bit of paint. ]
no subject
no subject
Alright, what about Loxley, then? He's like, the epitome of dashing. And very charming. And he has great hair.
[ And he smells nice, and has beautiful eyes, and has horns, and he's a good kisser, and, and, and... ]
no subject
—Not as romantic prospect exactly, of course. He's slightly too old.
no subject
But I agree that Richard is delightful. I like his non-romantic company.
no subject
[Ugh. Enthusiasm.]
no subject
no subject
no subject
[ Another dip into the suds. ]
Say — [ As in say, you're a smart cookie, whaddya think of— ] — How would you define romantic, anyway?
no subject
no subject
Both? I have a feeling it's more complex than what people write in books, ya know? Do you think there's a universal definition, or is it completely subjective, but with overlap?
no subject
In any case, no. [This particular sigil was drawn in something less permanent than paint. It's coming up marvelously well under the scrub brush.] No feeling is universal, but all feelings have a sort of logic to them, I think. Which is precisely why I would disagree and say that romance is always so much more complicated in books than in real life. It has to be or else it wouldn't be so interesting to such a wide audience. I guarantee that half the people who love one another in real life do so simply because they share some sense of consideration for each other.
no subject
[ That, a direct response to the claim that Bastien would be better off without his mustache, but Athessa quiets to listen to Wysteria's answer. ]
The ones I've read all just seem... too samey.
I suppose you think that Chevalier should shave his mustache, too?
no subject
Or rather, I suspect Ser Lyon du Lyon could do whatever he liked with his face and it would make no difference to his general—
[She gestures with a soapy hand. You know. All of him.]
no subject
[ Seems as good a word as any, and since I'm contractually obligated to not have my characters express too much interest in one another, she moves on: ]
What about Nikos?
no subject
no subject
[Eh.]
no subject
Hm. Gross. [ That, in reaction to this next sigil being painted on with something that starts to dribble rust-colored rivulets down the wall at the introduction of the sudsy water.
Let's just...ignore that and move on. ]
no subject
After a few moments of scrubbing at her own section of sigil, Wysteria settles on a slightly more challenging subject:]
What is your opinion on Enchanter Isaac?
no subject
Hmmmmmyeah? I bet he was really handsome at our age. Not that he's old, or not-handsome now, but —
[ — you know. ]
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)